Marine environmental protection in mineral resource development in the Arctic zone of Russia
Abstract
International and environmental law in Russia does not provide a preventive and precautionary approach to forestall degradation of the marine environment and the “polluter pays” principle at the present stage. The author proposes supplementing international environmental law in the investigated area with an approach based on the principle that the polluter not only pays but also restores. Improvement of approaches and principles of international law will be the basis for changing Russian legislation and legislation of other countries in order to prevent degradation of the marine environment. After an oil spill, the coastal waters of the seas and their ecosystems are the most vulnerable; therefore, the national legislation of states is primarily interested in legal regulation of marine environmental protection in case of oil and petroleum product spills. The legal obligation on oil and gas producing companies to carry out measures to remediate the marine environment will require them to finance scientific research, search and develop new technologies for the safe development of subsoil resources and restoration of the marine environment. This study is a comprehensive analysis of the scientific research results in the field of biology, environmental protection, protection of water bodies, marine environment, as well as international and Russian environmental law governing relations in the field of marine environment protection during the development of mineral deposits on the continental shelf, internal sea waters, in the territorial sea and the adjacent zone of the Russian Federation.
About the Author
T. A. YakovlevaRussian Federation
Yakovleva Tatyana Afanasyevna ‒ Candidate of Juridical Sciences, Associate Professor, Chair of Arctic Law and Law of the Countries of the Asia-Pacific Region, Faculty of Law
Yakutsk
References
1. Tolstikov A.V., Astaf’ev D.A., Shtein Ia.I., Kabalin M.Iu., Naumova L.A. Zapasy i resursy uglevodorodov, perspektivy izucheniia i promyshlennogo osvoeniia nedr morei Rossii v XXI v. // Geologiia nefti i gaza. 2018. № 4s. S. 73-85. https://doi.org/10.31087/0016-7894-4s-2018-73-85.
2. Skorobogatov V.A. Budushchee rossiiskogo gaza i nefti // Geologiia nefti i gaza. 2018. № 4s. S. 31-43. https://doi.org/10.31087/0016-7894-4s-2018-31-43.
3. Malashenkov B.M., Akchurin L.I. Strukturnye izmeneniia v sfere gosudarstvennogo regulirovaniia razrabotki mestorozhdenii poleznykh iskopaemykh na kontinental’nom shel’fe SShA // Gosudarstvennoe upravlenie. Elektronnyi vestnik. 2020. № 79. S. 51-66. https://doi.org/10.2441/2070-1381-2020-10048.
4. Edwards R., Evans A. The challenges of marine spatial planning in the Arctic: Results from the ACCESS programme // Ambio. 2017. Vol. 46. P. 486–496. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-017-0959-x.
5. Ekzar’ian V.N., Akhmadiev A.K. Problemy i voprosy okhrany prirodnoi sredy pri osvoenii uglevodorodnykh resursov v Mirovom okeane // Nauki o Zemle i nedropol’zovanie. 2021. T. 44. № 4. S. 485-495. https://doi.org/10.21285/2686-9993-2021-44-4-485-495.
6. Novikov M.A., Draganov D.M. Zagriazneniia vody i donnykh otlozhenii tiazhelymi metallami v oblasti poliarnogo fronta Barentseva moria // Vestnik MGTU. 2018. T. 21. № 1. S.150-159. https://doi.org/10.21443/1560-9278-2018-21-1-150-159
7. Ivanova L.V., Sokolov K.M., Kharitonova G.N. Tendentsii zagriazneniia plastikom akvatorii i poberezh’ia Barentseva moria i sopredel’nykh vod v usloviiakh izmeneniia klimata // Arktika i Sever. 2018. № 32. S. 121-145. https://doi.org/10.17238\assn2221-2698.2018.32.121.
8. Geyer R., Jambeck J.R., Lavender K. Law Production, use, and fate of all plastics ever made //Science Advences.2017. Vol. 3. № 7. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1700782.
9. Arabova Z.M., Arabov M.Sh., Prokhorov E.M., Saadati P.A. Problemy i puti snizheniia antropogennogo vozdeistviia na vody mirovogo okeana // Vestnik Astrakhanskogo gosudarstvennogo tekhnicheskogo universiteta. Seriia: Morskaia tekhnika i tekhnologiia. № 3. S. 41-47. (2019). https://doi.org/10.24143/2073-1574-2019-3-41-47.
10. Kudel’kin N.S. Pravovaia okhrana morskoi sredy Arktiki ot razrusheniia chuzherodnymi vidami // Vestnik universiteta im. O.E. Kutafina. 2019. № 1 (53). S. 110-119. https://doi.org/10.17803/2311-5998.2019.53.1.110-119
11. Vasil’ev S.A. Problemy ekologicheskoi bezopasnosti torgovogo moreplavaniia // Okeanskii menedzhment. 2021. № 1 (10). S. 18-22.
12. Nersesov B.A., Rimskii-Korsakov N.A. Rezul’taty ekologicheskikh issledovanii rossiiskikh arkticheskikh morei // Rossiiskaia Arktika. 2021. № 13. S. 14-25. https://doi.org/10.24412/2658-4255-2021-2-14-25.
13. Ehlers P. Blue growth and ocean govemance – how to balance the use and the protection of the sea // WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs. 2016. Vol. 15. P. 187-203. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-017-0959-x.
14. Ermolov A.A. Ekologicheskaia bezopasnost’ arkticheskikh beregov Rossii: uglevodorodnoe zagriaznenie i metody vosstanovleniia // Vesti gazovoi nauki. 2017. № 5 (33). S. 116-124.
15. Agafonov V.B. Pravovoe obespechenie okhrany okruzhaiushchei sredy i ekologicheskoi bezopasnosti pri pol’zovanii nedrami // Lex Russica. 2016. № 6 (115). S. 61-81. https://doi.org/10.17803/1729-5920.2016.116.6.061-081.
16. Agafonov V.B., Ignat’ev, D.A. Osobennosti poniatiinogo apparata okhrany okruzhaiushchei sredy i obespecheniia ekologicheskoi bezopasnosti pri pol’zovanii nedrami v zakonodatel’stve Rossiiskoi Federatsii i zarubezhnykh stran // Aktual’nye problemy rossiiskogo prava. 2018. № 5 (90). S. 221-235. https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2018.90.5.221-235.
17. Zhavoronkova N.G., Agafonov V.B. Sovremennoe sostoianie i perspektivy sovershenstvovaniia zakonodatel’stva v sfere predostavleniia prava pol’zovaniia uchastkami nedr i okhrany okruzhaiushchei sredy Arkticheskoi zony Rossiiskoi Federatsii // Aktual’nye problemy rossiiskogo prava. 2018. № 6 (91). S. 191-198. https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2018.91.6.191-198.
18. Khludeneva N.I. Perspektivy razvitiia pravovoi okhrany arkticheskikh ekosistem // Zhurnal rossiiskogo prava. 2015. № 11 (227). S. 114-122.
19. Baramidze D.D. Sovershenstvovanie ekologicheskogo zakonodatel’stva s tsel’iu okhrany okruzhaiushchei sredy Rossiiskoi Arktiki // Vestnik Udmurtskogo universiteta. Seriia «Ekonomika i pravo». 2017. T.27. № 3. S. 88-92.
20. Ranganathan S. Ocean floor grab: international law and the making of an extractive imaginary // European Journal of International Law. 2019. Vol. 30. Iss 2P. 573-600. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chz027.
21. Queffelec B., Bonnin M., Ferreira B., Bertrand S., Da Silva S.T., Diouf F., et al. Marine spatial planning and the risk of ocean grabbing in the tropical Atlantic // ICES Journal of Marine Science. 2021. Vol. 78. lss.4. P. 1196-1208. https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsab006.
22. Balk L., Hylland K.,Hansson T., Berntssen M.N.G., Beyer J., Jonsson G., et al. Biomarkers in natural fish populations indicate adverse biological effects of offshore oil production // PLoS ONE. 2011. Vol. 6 Iss. 5. P.e19735. https://doi.org/10.173/joumal.pone.0019735.
23. Sorhus E., Incardona J.P.,Karlsen O., Linbo T., Sorensen L., Nordtug T., et al. Cuede oil exposures reveal roles for intracellular calcium cycling in haddock craniofacial and cardiac development // Scientific Reports. 2016. Vol. 6. P. 31058. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep31058.
24. Main C.E., Ruhl H.A., Jones D.O.B., Yool A., Thornton B., Mayor D.J. Hydrocarbon contamination affect deep-sea benthic oxygen uptake and microbial community composition // Deep-Sea Research. Part 1: Ocean-organic Research Papers. 2014. Vol. 100. P. 79-87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr.201412/008.
25. Cherepanova A.E. Zagriaznenie morskoi sredy // Sovremennye innovatsii. 2018. № 2 (25). S. 15-19.
Review
For citations:
Yakovleva T.A. Marine environmental protection in mineral resource development in the Arctic zone of Russia. Вестник Северо-Восточного федерального университета имени М. К. Аммосова. Vestnik of North-Eastern Federal University. Серия «Общественные науки. Social science». 2023;(2):51-58. (In Russ.)