Preview

Вестник Северо-Восточного федерального университета имени М. К. Аммосова. Vestnik of North-Eastern Federal University. Серия «Общественные науки. Social science»

Advanced search

The problem of robbery qualification committed in complicity with an unfit subject

Abstract

The article deals with the problem of qualifying a robbery committed in complicity together with an indelicate person. In the course of the study, the author carried out a comparative analysis of the criminal law norms on complicity enshrined in the criminal legislation of the RSFSR of 1960 and the provisions of the current criminal legislation of Russia. In the course of the study, special attention was paid to the study of the decisions of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the USSR, the RSFSF and the Russian Federation, containing recommendations on the qualification of crimes committed in complicity with a person who is not subject to criminal liability due to age or insanity. In addition, this paper explores doctrinal views and established judicial and investigative practice regarding the problem under consideration. Based on the results of the study, the author came to the conclusion that the problem of the criminal law assessment of the act committed by the guilty party together with the indelicate person is due to the introduction of the provision on a mediocre performer into the norms of criminal law on complicity. This provision provides for liability for a person committing a crime by the hands of an unfit subject, however, the issue of qualifying an act committed by a guilty person together with a person who does not have the characteristics of a subject, according to the author, remains unsettled, as evidenced by conflicting judicial and investigative practice. In this connection, the author proposes legislative innovations designed to solve the problem of qualifying crimes, including robberies committed jointly with an indelicate person, and to exhaust discussions on the issue under consideration.

About the Author

E. V. Son
Vladivostok branch, Far Eastern Law Institute of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia
Russian Federation

Son Eduard Vadimovich – Lecturer, Department of Operational Investigation and Administrative Activities

Vladivostok



References

1. Ugolovnyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 13 iyunya 1996 g. № 63-FZ / Rossiyskaya gazeta ot 19 iyunya 1996 g. № 114;

2. O sudebnoy praktike po delam ob iznasilovanii: postanovleniye Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda SSSR ot 25 marta 1964 g. № 2 // Dostup iz SPS «Konsul’tant plyus» (data obrashcheniya: 20.05.2022) – dokument utratil silu;

3. O sudebnoy praktike po delam ob iznasilovanii: postanovleniye Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 22 aprelya 1992 g. № 4 // Dostup iz SPS «Konsul’tant plyus» (data obrashcheniya: 20.05.2022) – dokument utratil silu;

4. Obzor sudebnoy praktiki Verkhovnogo suda RF za IV kvartal 2000 g. // Byulleten’ Verkhovnogo suda RF. 2001. № 8;

5. O sudebnoy praktike po delam o krazhe, grabezhe i razboye: postanovleniye Plenuma Verkhovnogo suda RF ot 27.12.2002 g. № 29 (red. ot 6 fevralya 2007 g.) // Rossiyskaya gazeta. Vyp. № 9 ot 18.01.2003g.;

6. Obzor sudebnoy praktiki Verkhovnogo suda RF za III kvartal 2004 g. // Byulleten’ Verkhovnogo suda RF. 2005. № 4;

7. Arkhiv Krasnoyarskogo krayevogo suda. Delo № 22-4478/2019 [Elektronnyy resurs] – URL: https:// sudact.ru/regular/doc/d464LfumPPWx/ (data obrashcheniya: 20.05.2022);

8. Arkhiv Zabaykal’skogo krayevogo suda. Delo № 44U-230/2019 [Elektronnyy resurs] – URL: https://sudact.ru/regular/doc/Fes36TovaZWm/ (data obrashcheniya: 20.05.2022);

9. Ofitsial’nyy sayt Gosudarstvennoy dumy Rossiyskoy Federatsii [Elektronnyy resurs] – URL: https://sozd.duma.gov.ru/bill/90010379-3 (data obrashcheniya: 20.05.2022);

10. Ozhegov S.I. i Shvedova N.YU. Tolkovyy slovar’ russkogo yazyka: 80 000 slov i frazeologicheskikh vyrazheniy. 4-ye izd., dopolnennoye. M.: Azbukovik, 1999. S. 567;

11. Inogamova-Khegay L.V. Verkhovnyy sud o khishchenii gruppoy lits po predvaritel’nomu sgovoru // Ugolovnoye pravo. 2016. № 3. S. 44-49;

12. Shikhanov V.N. Uchastiye v sovershenii prestupleniya s litsami, ne podlezhashchimi ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti: podkhody k pravovoy otsenke v sovremennoy sudebnoy praktike // Yuridicheskaya nauka i pravookhranitel’naya praktika. 2014. № 2 (28). S. 56; 1

13. Kozlov A.P. Souchastiye: traditsii i real’nost’. SPb.: Yuridicheskiy tsentr Press, 2001. S. 213;

14. Rarog A.I., Yesakov G.A. Ponimaniye Verkhovnym Sudom RF «gruppy lits» sootvetstvuyet printsipu spravedlivosti // Rossiyskaya yustitsiya. 2002. № 1. S. 51–53;

15. Drepelev A.S. Souchastnik prestupleniya: zakon, teoriya, praktika: diss. ... kand. yurid. nauk. M., 2016. S. 114;

16. Naumov A.V. Rossiyskoye ugolovnoye pravo. Obshchaya chast’: Kurs lektsiy: v 3 t. 4-ye izd., pererab. i dop. M.: Volters Kluver, 2007. T.1. S. 350-351;

17. Ugolovnoye pravo Rossii. Obshchaya chast’: uchebnik dlya bakalavrov /otv. red. A.I. Plotnikov. Orenburg: OOO IPK «Universitet», 2016. S. 100;

18. Kassatsionnoye opredeleniye Verkhovnogo suda RF ot 31 marta 2011g. № 56-O11-20 [Elektronnyy resurs] – URL: http://vsrf.ru/stor_pdf.php?id=433720 (data obrashcheniya: 20.05.2022);

19. Dosayeva G.S., Kostandov M.M. Oshibka v ugolovnom prave: ponyatiye i znacheniye // Nauka i obrazovaniye: khozyaystvo i ekonomika; predprinimatel’stvo; pravo i upravleniye 2021. № 5 (132). S. 96-98.


Review

For citations:


Son E.V. The problem of robbery qualification committed in complicity with an unfit subject. Вестник Северо-Восточного федерального университета имени М. К. Аммосова. Vestnik of North-Eastern Federal University. Серия «Общественные науки. Social science». 2022;(4):63-71. (In Russ.)

Views: 214


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2587-5612 (Online)