Preview

Вестник Северо-Восточного федерального университета имени М. К. Аммосова. Vestnik of North-Eastern Federal University. Серия «Общественные науки. Social science»

Advanced search

Problems of Organizing Digital Interaction of an Investigator in Criminal Proceedings

https://doi.org/10.25587/2587-5612-2026-2-37-46

Abstract

The article examines the problems of organizing digital interaction of an investigator in criminal proceedings through the analysis of digitalization tools used for obtaining, transmitting, recording and verifying information at the pre-trial stage. The scientific problem lies in the fact that digital tools are already widely used in investigative practice, while the procedure for their application remains uneven and does not always ensure sufficient procedural traceability of electronic information. The purpose of the study is to analyze the main digitalization tools used in the interaction of the investigator with participants in pre-trial proceedings, public authorities, organizations and external information sources, as well as to identify the problems of their organizational and procedural application. The materials of the study include criminal procedure legislation of the Russian Federation, legislation on information and access to information, scholarly publications on the digitalization of criminal proceedings, judicial practice and the results of a survey of 14 investigative officers. The formal legal, systemic, structural and comparative legal methods were used, together with the analysis of judicial practice and qualitative generalization of empirical data. The study identifies information-search, communication, evidentiary, remote and security-related tools of the investigator’s digital interaction. It is concluded that their use increases the efficiency of investigation, but is accompanied by problems of confirming the source of digital information, preserving electronic objects, differentiating access, procedural recording and digital training of investigative officers. The practical significance of the study lies in the possibility of using the conclusions to improve departmental algorithms for working with electronic information, organizing digital document flow and developing procedural rules for handling digital evidence.

About the Authors

A. A. Pavlova
M. K. Ammosov North-Eastern Federal University
Russian Federation

Pavlova Arzulana Akramovna – Cand. Sci. (Law), Docent, Associate Professor, Head of the Department of Criminal Law and Process, Faculty of Law

Yakutsk



D. E. Han
M. K. Ammosov North-Eastern Federal University
Russian Federation

Han Darina Evgenievna – Senior Specialist, 2nd category, Yakutsk city department of bailiffs of the Office of the Federal Bailiff Service of Russia for the Republic of Sakha (Yakutia)

Yakutsk



References

1. Decree of the President of the Russian Federation No. 203 of May 9, 2017 On the Strategy for the Development of the Information Society in the Russian Federation for 2017-2030. Sobranie zakonodatelstva RF. 2017;(20):Art. 2901 (in Russian).

2. Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation No. 174-FZ of December 18, 2001 (as amended on April 09, 2026). Available at: https://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_34481/ (in Russian).

3. Federal Law No. 149-FZ of July 27, 2006 On Information, Information Technologies and Information Protection. Available at: https://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_61798/ (in Russian).

4. Federal Law No. 8-FZ of February 9, 2009 On Ensuring Access to Information on the Activities of State Bodies and Local Self-Government Bodies. Available at: https://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_ doc_LAW_84602/ (in Russian).

5. Federal Law No. 501-FZ of December 30, 2021 On Amendments to the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation. Rossiyskaya gazeta. 2022;(2):January 11 (in Russian).

6. Levchenko IA. Conceptual ideas of the investigator’s procedural activity in the context of digital technologies. Rossiyskiy sledovatel. 2023;(2):15 (in Russian).

7. Vlasov PE. Priority areas of digital transformation of criminal proceedings. Rossiyskiy sledovatel. 2023;(6):16 (in Russian).

8. Vlasov PE. Debatable directions of digitalization of criminal proceedings. Rossiyskiy sledovatel. 2024;(9):22 (in Russian).

9. Shestakova LA, Kochnev ME. Problems and prospects of using digital technologies in criminal proceedings of the Russian Federation. Juridical Analytical Journal. 2024;19(1):18 (in Russian).

10. Khimicheva OV. Investigative actions: on the digital transformation of their production. Kriminologicheskiy zhurnal. 2023;(2):173 (in Russian).

11. Ishchenko PP. Investigative actions in the context of digitalization of criminal proceedings. Sibirskie ugolovno-protsessualnye i kriminalisticheskie chteniya. 2022;(1):30 (in Russian).

12. Smirnov AV. Electronic evidence, electronic proof, artificial intelligence: what next? Ugolovnoe sudoproizvodstvo. 2024;(1):27 (in Russian).

13. Artemova VV, Ermakov SV, Ivanov DA. Foreign experience and prospects for using the electronic format of criminal cases in the Russian Federation. Mezhdunarodnoe ugolovnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnaya yustitsiya. 2024;(1):8 (in Russian).

14. Pobedkin AV. Conducting investigative actions using videoconferencing systems in pre-trial proceedings: the framework of procedural guarantees. Vestnik Ufimskogo yuridicheskogo instituta MVD Rossii. 2022;(3):81 (in Russian).

15. Malysheva OA. On a new vector of professional training of an investigator in the context of digital transformation. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2022;(480):266 (in Russian).

16. Sharov AV, Arkhipova IA. Improving the use of special knowledge in information and telecommunication technologies by an investigator. Vestnik ekonomicheskoy bezopasnosti. 2022;(6):261 (in Russian).

17. Dubynin EA, Kosmodemyanskaya EE. Possibilities of using digital technologies in the detection and investigation of crimes. Vestnik Sibirskogo yuridicheskogo instituta MVD Rossii. 2022;1(46):33 (in Russian).

18. Judgment of the Yakutsk City Court of the Republic of Sakha (Yakutia) of January 24, 2024 in case No. 1-204/2024. Available at: https://sudact.ru/regular/doc/cO7zRNZ2Q3Uc/ (in Russian).

19. Judgment of the Mirninsky District Court of the Republic of Sakha (Yakutia) of August 26, 2025 in case No. 1-97/2025. Available at: https://sudact.ru/regular/doc/KAslc2Ui7Ggl/ (in Russian).

20. Appellate ruling of the Supreme Court of the Udmurt Republic of March 1, 2023 No. 22-350/2023 in case No. 1-168/2022. Available at: https://sudact.ru/regular/doc/OLZsY507eaWm/ (in Russian).

21. Judgment of the Yakutsk City Court of the Republic of Sakha (Yakutia) of February 13, 2025 in case No. 1-302/2025. Available at: https://sudact.ru/regular/doc/7i3tDN8yYd5X/ (in Russian).

22. Ruling of the Judicial Chamber for Criminal Cases of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation of November 12, 2024 No. 25-UDP24-16-K4. Available at: https://legalacts.ru/sud/opredelenie-sudebnoikollegii-po-ugolovnym-delam-verkhovnogo-suda-rf-ot-12112024-n-25-udp24-16-k4/ (in Russian).


Review

For citations:


Pavlova A.A., Han D.E. Problems of Organizing Digital Interaction of an Investigator in Criminal Proceedings. Вестник Северо-Восточного федерального университета имени М. К. Аммосова. Vestnik of North-Eastern Federal University. Серия «Общественные науки. Social science». 2026;(2):37-44. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25587/2587-5612-2026-2-37-46

Views: 11

JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 3034-7394 (Online)